• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Conventus Law

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

  • About Us
  • Channels
    • Jurisdiction Channel
    • Practice Area Channel
    • Industry Channel
    • Business Of Law
    • Law Firms
    • Special Reports
  • Video
  • Events
  • Explore
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Conventus Doc
x
Search

More results...

Generic filters
Home » Special Report » Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

October 2, 2015

October 2, 2015 by

5 September, 2015 

 

 

Shadow Companies – The Problem
 
A shadow company is a Hong Kong-registered company that uses a famous brand or company name as part of its own name, whilst being totally unconnected to the brand owner.
 
Shadow companies are normally used as fronts to allow individuals behind them to trade off the reputation of a brand owner’s name in the PRC. 

The key elements of a shadow company are:
 
a. it has registered a name which incorporates the name of a well known brand;
b. its director(s)/shareholder(s) are PRC individuals;
c. its company secretary is a secretarial company which will usually incorporate the shadow company and provide its registered office address; and
d. it will authorise a separate PRC entity, which is often connected to the individuals behind the shadow company, to use its name, claiming authorisation from the brand owner.

In our experience, the shadow company will register their registered office address as their place of business with the Inland Revenue so that they have a Business Registration Certificate, giving the illusion they are trading in Hong Kong. 
 
In addition, the shadow company may also apply for a Hong Kong trademark under different classes to those used by the legitimate brand owner. 
 
Shadow companies pose substantial risks of financial and reputational damage to brand owners.

 

What Can You Do As Brand Owner?

 

Taking Action Against Shadow Companies In Hong Kong.

 

The first step would be to send a cease and desist letter to the shadow company demanding they stop infringing your intellectual property rights. The threat of using court proceedings may cause the infringement to cease and the director of the shadow company to change the company name. 
 
If no response is made, the next step would be to issue court proceedings against the shadow company. 
 
Once a writ is issued it is unusual for the shadow company to defend the proceedings. Normally default judgment and an injunction can be obtained within 2 months of proceedings being issued.
 
The last step, after an injunction has been ordered, would be to serve the injunction on the Companies Registry. The Companies Registrar will require the company to change its name within 6 weeks of being informed of the injunction. In the event the director does not change the name of the shadow company the Companies Registrar will arrange for the company’s registered number to be substituted in place of its name. 

CH-CoatedSHlogo_CMYK-withSpace

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jezamine Fewins, Partner, Stephenson Harwood

jezamine.fewins@shlegal.com

Primary Sidebar

PRESS RELEASES

  • Hong Kong – Linklaters Advises On Wuxi Lead Intelligent Equipment’s HK$4.9bn HKEX IPO. 11 February 2026
  • Hong Kong – Linklaters Advises On Huatai Securities’ Hk$10bn Convertible Bond Offering. 11 February 2026
  • Singapore – Bird & Bird Advises International Finance Corporation (IFC) On Investment In Mozark. 11 February 2026
  • UK – Bird & Bird Advises Proteome Sciences PLC On Placing, Subscription And Oversubscribed Retail Offer. 11 February 2026
  • US – World Trademark Review Ranks Crowell & Moring In WTR 1000 2026 Guide. 11 February 2026

NEWS FEED

    February 11, 2026

    Corporate Crime And Its UBO Under Indonesia’s New Penal Code And Criminal Procedures.

    February 11, 2026

    Patentability Of Artificial Neural Networks To Be Decided By UK Supreme Court On Wednesday 11 February.

    February 11, 2026

    China – Judicial Trends In Trademark Infringement And Unfair Competition In Live-streaming E-commerce: Lessons From The Typical Cases Selected By The Beijing High People’s Court And The Supreme People’s Court.

    - James Gong - Bird & Bird,
    February 11, 2026

    The Future Of eBilling For Corporate Legal Teams.

    - Sacha Kirk - Lawcadia,
    February 11, 2026

    UK FCA Proposes New Sustainability Disclosure Rules For Listed Companies.

    February 11, 2026

    Belgium – Belgian Government Introduces Draft Labor Law Reform: Key Changes On Work Rules, Part-time Work, Night Work, And Notice Periods.

    February 11, 2026

    Indonesia Introduces A Dedicated BNPL Regulatory Framework.

    - Winnie Yamashita Rolindrawan - SSEK,
    February 10, 2026

    Philippines – PERA: The Path To Financial Security During Retirement.

    - Nilo T. Divina - DivinaLaw,
    February 10, 2026

    OFW Contract Substitution: Illegal And Punishable Under Philippine Law.

    - Nilo T. Divina - DivinaLaw,
    February 10, 2026

    Philippines – DivinaLaw Speaks On Power Price Volatility.

Footer

Conventus Law
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

CONVENTUS LAW

  • About Us
  • Explore
  • Video
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Jurisdiction Channel
  • Practice Area Channel
  • Industry Channel
  • Law Firms
  • Business Of Law
  • Special Reports

OTHERS

CONVENTUS DOCS
CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, 13/F, Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

social@conventuslaw.com

Terms of use | Privacy statement © 2026 Conventus Law. All Rights Reserved.